Skip to main content

Table 1 Parameters for the bindings of CaM and its mutants to CT1

From: Lobe-related concentration- and Ca2+-dependent interactions of calmodulin with C- and N-terminal tails of the CaV1.2 channel

 

CaM

CaM12

CaM34

CaM1234

EGTA

100 nM

10 μM

2 mM

EGTA

100 nM

10 μM

2 mM

EGTA

100 nM

10 μM

2 mM

EGTA

100 nM

10 μM

2 mM

\({ \rm{K}_{\rm{d}_{1} }\, {({\upmu}{\text M})}}\)

1.17

2.19

0.40

0.39

2.73

2.00

3.19

1.48

2.64

3.90

2.45

2.54

3.07

3.39

2.53

2.41

\({\rm{B}}_{{\max_{1} }\, {({\rm mol}/{\rm mol})}}\)

0.28

0.15

0.58

0.91

0.54

0.43

0.85

0.84

0.60

0.70

0.61

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.63

0.62

\( {\rm{K}_{{\rm{d}_{2} }\, {({\upmu}{\text M})}}} \)

  

33.27

10.92

  

29.67

25.30

6.93

7.08

7.44

6.75

6.93

9.44

8.70

7.03

\({\rm{B}}_{{\max_{2} }\, {({\rm mol}/{\rm mol})}} \)

  

0.44

0.83

  

0.49

0.83

0.51

0.57

0.61

0.64

0.35

0.62

0.63

0.62

R2

0.977

0.843

0.928

0.961

0.987

0.986

0.995

0.990

0.974

0.978

0.994

0.968

0.973

0.958

0.946

0.969

  1. Data from the GST pull-down assay shown in Figs. 2, 3 were analyzed with a software SigmaPlot 10.0 and with single or double Hill equations (see “Materials and Methods”). \( K_{{d_{1} }} \) and \( K_{{d_{2} }} \): apparent dissociation constants, \( B_{{\max_{1} }} \) and \( B_{{\max_{2} }} \): the maximum bindings, R 2: coefficient of determination. Blanks in \( K_{{d_{2} }} \) and \( B_{{\max_{2} }} \) meant a better fit with the single-site model than the double-site model