Fig. 2From: Motor cortical excitability in peritoneal dialysis: a single-pulse TMS studyTMS results in PD patients. a Active motor threshold (AMT) and resting motor threshold (RMT) did not differ between PD patients and normal subjects. b Central motor conduction time (CMCT) did not differ between the two groups. Root latency and cortical latency were prolonged. c Amplitude of motor-evoked potential (MEP) was significantly smaller in PD patients than in normal subjects at all stimulus intensities. d Cortical silent period (CSP) did not differ between the two groups at any stimulus intensityBack to article page